Monday, June 28, 2010

Just for the Sake of Comparison

IPRA wants to give Mike Mette 90 days for allegedly being drunk off duty (even though there is no documented proof), walking home (not driving) and being the victim of an attack, while a woman who left messages on a voicemail system threatening revenge and job retaliation that ended up being transcribed by IAD investigators onto a complaint log number is up for what again?

We were just curious.

Labels:

31 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

whats the comparison? There is No way they are giving Mette 90 days on an undocumented, unfounded allegation. That SCREAMS lawsuit. If all of us were given suspension for speculation we would have less than 20 percent of us on the street all year.
Until he is GIVEN a 90 day suspension or any suspension for this, lets not stir a pot that isn't even full yet huh?

6/28/2010 12:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I may be wrong, but didn't Jfled promise Mike all his back pay? Did he ever get it. Maybe Jfled used part of it to build a door from his bathroom to his kitchen so he could go thru it and then grab a beer from his fridge. Of course it would be a green bottle so it felt like dugan was with him

6/28/2010 12:25:00 AM  
Anonymous 29 and a day said...

Scc There you go again using rational thinking and logic

Whats wrong with you?

I pity you guys be safe out there

6/28/2010 12:32:00 AM  
Anonymous ISP Sgt said...

And maybe the State Police will sneak in and open their own case on this-

6/28/2010 12:32:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmmm, let's see, Mike is white....male....and a blue shirt! Yep, 90 days sounds about right. If he could fix anyone of those "problems" then he'd be aight like henny penney, right "boss" ?

6/28/2010 12:45:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She threatened the man's son, not just his job! This is egregious!

These fake reverends run this city! If Cozzi were a black officer connected to E. Brown's church, he'd be an exempt right now! Disgusting!

6/28/2010 12:48:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

SUNK

6/28/2010 01:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't it kinda funny how they are both from the same district... the only difference is one wears a blue shirts and the other wears a white..... wonder what an elitist regime does for morale......

6/28/2010 01:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kinda like when Aunt B got cleared of any wrong doing the same night that they found narcotics in one of her properties.

6/28/2010 02:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Until he is GIVEN a 90 day suspension or any suspension for this, lets not stir a pot that isn't even full yet huh?

I agree. Until Mette serves his time, even HE can't grieve it. To grieve ANY suspension time, the officer in question must FIRST serve the time. Once that happens, the sky's the limit.

6/28/2010 07:01:00 AM  
Anonymous HATER said...

be careful what u say she may become the next 1st deputy!

DO ANY OF THESE EXEMPTS HAVE SECURITY CLEARANCE NOW?

U EVER NOTICE THESE EXEMPTS ASK FOR COPIES OF REPORTS BUT ARE NOT PART OF THE INVESTIGATION.

CUELLO DIDNT EVEN KNOW HER DAUGHTER IS PART OF A DRUG CREW! PENNY THROWS OUT THREATS LIKE A PULASKI AND MADISON STREET THUG!

DOCUMENT WHO U GIVE COPIES OF ANYTHING TO REMEMBER A CERTAIN ALDERWOMAN ON THE SOUTH SIDE WAS GIVING THE DOPE BOYS INFO ON POLICE LETTER HEAD.

J-FLED IS SURROUNDING HIMSELF WITH CLOWNS JUST LIKE DALEY DOES SO HE CAN B THE SMARTEST ASSHAT IN THE ROOM.

6/28/2010 07:59:00 AM  
Anonymous HATER said...

part 2

WHY DOESNT THE OFFICER POST THE TAPE TO THE NET!

SCC I BELIEVE IF THE TAPES WERE POSTED SHE WOULD BE LAUNCHED.

SO MR. MAILMAN DONT BE SCARED UR COVERED UNDER THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT STATUTE.

BUT U R A MAILMAN IN A SPIFFY BLUE COSTUME GO FIGURE.

6/28/2010 08:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

SCC, Take a close look at the Mette case. You are presenting it wrong.

6/28/2010 08:52:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think Mike Mette has been thru enough.

They need to back the fuck off of him!

6/28/2010 09:45:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Kinda like when Aunt B got cleared of any wrong doing the same night that they found narcotics in one of her properties.

6/28/2010 02:00:00 AM"

IT'S CALLED THE DOUBLE STANDARD. MEANWHILE YOU CLOWNS CONTINUE TO PIMP FOR THEM W/YOUR ONE BAG DOPE PINCHES, RECKLESS CONDUCTS & DOPWS.
"I'ZE BE THE REAL POLEECE," YEAH KEEP TELLING YOURSELF THAT SHIT FOR BRAINS

6/28/2010 10:40:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

mike is not a boss

a boss would skate all charges and / or allegations

mike is cannon fodder, that's an old term for jfled's ass boy

how does that goof (fled) look in a mirror and justify his existance?

6/28/2010 11:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kinda like when Aunt B got cleared of any wrong doing the same night that they found narcotics in one of her properties.

So under your thinking, if narcotics or guns are found at one of your investment properties, regardless of who lives there, you should be held liable?

6/28/2010 12:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mette got some bad legal advice. He should have pled to the misdemeanor and been done with it.

6/28/2010 02:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"So under your thinking, if narcotics or guns are found at one of your investment properties, regardless of who lives there, you should be held liable?"

6/28/2010 12:21:00 PM


Not necessarily. However, if the tenant happens to be an immediate family member(daughter)and I place visited by the sworn member, I should think, at minimum, an investigation is in order. I don't think anyone should be cleared within hours without an internal investigation being conducted. As a matter of fact, I'd like to see an outside agency investigate complaints involving expempt members of this organization. How's that sound?

6/28/2010 04:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a sad and sick JOKE! That's why we don't trust the brass. We take the fall and they walk away. If any P.O. did that they would be at call back for a long long time.

6/28/2010 04:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Concerning Penny's state acquittal, will J-Fled seek a friend from fed-land to pursue the civil rights violation ala' Cozzi?

Yeah, I didn't think so.

6/28/2010 07:22:00 PM  
Anonymous Another Point of View said...

Anonymous said...
Kinda like when Aunt B got cleared of any wrong doing the same night that they found narcotics in one of her properties.

So under your thinking, if narcotics or guns are found at one of your investment properties, regardless of who lives there, you should be held liable?

6/28/2010 12:21:00 PM

*******

Under normal circumstances, no. However, in this case, Asst Supt Cuello can reasonably be expected to be in that condo fairly often, visiting her daughter. A normal landlord checking on their tenant wouldn't be there more than once a month, but you visit your kids more often than that if they are close to you. She had to have seen something that just didn't fit. A parent who knows their kids knows when something isn't right.
Others have suggested in the past that perhaps the daughter and boyfriend were put there by Cuello because they were trouble. If so, she should have expected trouble, and really snooped around. If not so, ask yourself: How was rent paid for? Who worked? What did they do for work?
Maybe a case where tough love would have been appropriate, but who knows.

6/28/2010 07:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"investment properties?"

her daughter lived there with the boyfriend.

investment property usually means it is vacant or someone else resides there, rents and pays money to you..usually someone not connected to you, or a family member, like a DAUGHTER>

I'm believing that the "investment property" was a place for the daughter to live because she had nowhere else to go, couldn't afford a place herself, or was borderline homeless. Aunt B did what any mother would do and provide a home for her kid, but don't call it "investment property".

6/28/2010 09:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kinda like when Aunt B got cleared of any wrong doing the same night that they found narcotics in one of her properties.

So under your thinking, if narcotics or guns are found at one of your investment properties, regardless of who lives there, you should be held liable?

6/28/2010 12:21:00 PM

I think the problem was with the SAME NIGHT AND a FAMILY MEMBER, not that it was an investment property; dipshit. How many IPRA investigations have you had that took only one night to resolve???

6/28/2010 09:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kinda like when Aunt B got cleared of any wrong doing the same night that they found narcotics in one of her properties.

So under your thinking, if narcotics or guns are found at one of your investment properties, regardless of who lives there, you should be held liable?

NO, THE THINKING LIKE, I SHOULD KNOW WHERE THE FUCK TO FIND DRUGS WITHIN MY OWN FAMILY MEMBERS IF I WANT TO CONTINUE TO BE A BIG BOSS OF A MAJOR CITY POLICE DEPT.
IF YOU ARE THAT CLUELESS CAN YOU EFFECTIVELY DO YOUR JOB? THE POLICE FIND DRUGS IN HOMES OF STRANGERS????????????

6/28/2010 09:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Or what happens if u demand coffee for free at starbucks while armed and off duty? How much time does that get you?

6/28/2010 09:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Leadership and supervisors are piss poor on this job,they cant be trusted, they have no honor,integrity or ethics. We the blue shirts make them all look good,when we glitter they shine and some how we allow them to treat us like second class citizens. Maybe its time for blue shirts to take a stand instead of just taking it. Stop talking and start taking an action dont talk the talk if you wont walk the walk,remember talk is cheap.

6/28/2010 10:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Leadership and supervisors are piss poor on this job,they cant be trusted, they have no honor,integrity or ethics. We the blue shirts make them all look good,when we glitter they shine and some how we allow them to treat us like second class citizens. Maybe its time for blue shirts to take a stand instead of just taking it. Stop talking and start taking an action dont talk the talk if you wont walk the walk,remember talk is cheap.

Yeah I see that your talk is real cheap...

6/29/2010 07:45:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Im taking a stand its just that Im alone,Iwas the one who stood in front of j-fed and told him he couldnt be trusted and left him speechless in his first townhall meeting.I also told him that leadership and supervision where piss poor on the 24 of Mar townhall meeting.I stand up to the white shirt and Im still doing it. What have you done? You can find me in 013 if you have a pair.

6/29/2010 04:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

last person that left a comment about yeah I see your talk is cheap must be a white shirt and must have had a nerve that twitched because the truth hurts.

6/29/2010 04:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Im taking a stand its just that Im alone,Iwas the one who stood in front of j-fed and told him he couldnt be trusted and left him speechless in his first townhall meeting.I also told him that leadership and supervision where piss poor on the 24 of Mar townhall meeting.I stand up to the white shirt and Im still doing it. What have you done? You can find me in 013 if you have a pair.

6/29/2010 04:24:00 PM

OK I went to 013 but couldn't find you since you didn't leave your name tough guy.

7/01/2010 11:03:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer Posts.......................... ..........................Older Posts